Hukum Pencurian Perspektif Tafsir Klasik dan Tafsir Kontemporer
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59841/tadhkirah.v2i4.309Keywords:
Classical Interpretation, Contemporary Interpretation, Qur’anic Interpretation, Theft Law, Theft PunishmentAbstract
A comparison between classical and contemporary interpretations regarding the law of theft contained in Surah Al-Mā’idah verse 38, which stipulates the punishment of hand amputation for theft. This verse has long been the basis of Islamic jurisprudence, but its interpretation has evolved over time. The method used is qualitative with a literature study approach, which examines classical sources of interpretation such as Tafsīr al-Qurṭubī and contemporary interpretations such as al-Mishbāḥ. The research findings show that classical interpretations view this verse textually and normatively, with a focus on the application of hudud law as a form of justice and protection of property rights, as well as the imposition of strict conditions to avoid misuse. Meanwhile, contemporary interpretations view this verse contextually and humanistically, paying attention to social, economic, and humanitarian conditions. The punishment of hand amputation is understood not only as physical punishment, but also as a tool for moral education, crime prevention, and protection of community welfare. Although both share the same goal of upholding justice and safeguarding the welfare of the people, contemporary interpretations emphasize a more flexible application of law to align with the values of social justice in the modern era. Thus, this study emphasizes the importance of contextualizing the understanding of Islamic law without neglecting the principles of sharia, which balance justice, humanity, and the welfare of the people.
Downloads
References
Abdi, F. (2018). Keluwesan hukum pidana Islam dalam jarimah hudud (pendekatan pada jarimah hudud pencurian). Al-Risalah: Forum Kajian Hukum dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.30631/alrisalah.v14i02.456
Abrar, A., & Yahya, J. (2024). Ta’zir terhadap pencurian di bawah nisab. [Nama Jurnal], 2(1), 51–70.
Ali, S. (2018). Resensi buku: Budiono Kusumohamidjojo, Ketertiban yang adil (Jakarta: Grasindo, 1999). El-Faqih, 4, 1–23.
Batubara, F., Harun, H., Nazori, A., Hadi, S. J., Wardani, R. K., & Yusuf, M. (2023). Aspek pidana dalam Undang-Undang Jaminan Fidusia menurut hukum pidana Islam (analisis Putusan No. 509/Pid.Sus/2021/PN.Jmb). Nalar Fiqh: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 14(1), 30–43. https://doi.org/10.30631/nf.v14i1.1348
Darsul, P. (2012). Konsep pidana hudud menurut Al-Qur’an. Jurnal Tafsir Tematik, 1(1), 134–146.
El-Awa, M. S. (1981). Punishment in Islamic law. American Trust Publications.
Hakim, A. N., Gayuh, & Munawir. (2023). Hukum potong tangan dalam QS. Al-Māidah ayat 38: Studi penafsiran perspektif hermeneutika Nasr Hamid Abu Zayd. Al-Furqan: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an dan Tafsir, 6(2), 190–207.
Hidayati, U., & Islamy, A. (2021). Tekstualisme dan kontekstualisme penafsiran kontemporer terhadap Surah Al-Māidah ayat 38. Poros Onim: Jurnal Sosial Keagamaan, 2(2), 97–112. https://doi.org/10.53491/porosonim.v2i2.116
Siadio, S., & Ismail. (2023). Keadilan dan maqāṣid al-syarī‘ah dalam reformasi hukum Islam. Al-Hurriyah: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 7(1), 1–15.
Sodiqin, A. (2017). Kontinuitas dan perubahan dalam penetapan hukum hudud: Dari naṣṣ hingga teks fikih. Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.24090/mnh.v10i2.933
Sufriadi, & Andriyadi, F. (2022). Pencurian menurut hukum Islam. Jurnal Al-Nadhair, 1(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.61433/alnadhair.v1i2.18
Vinet, L., & Zhedanov, A. (2011). A “missing” family of classical orthogonal polynomials. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 44(8), 085201. https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/44/8/085201
